“Sharing” is a misused term that needs to die

cindyschnackel

C

“How Image Sharing Sites are Undermining Photography,” by photographer Tara Bradford, July 18, 2013

http://www.tarabradford.com/2013/07/every-photographers-nightmare.html

This could as easily be about infringement of images of paintings, sculpture, etc, or for that matter, poetry and writing.

This article was posted on a Facebook group this morning, and many artists I know, (myself included), are well acquainted with the author’s struggles to protect her copyrights.  Infringement really does cause damage. It’s not flattering and it’s not really free promotion. (If its unattributed the ‘free promotion’ excuse is especially stupid.)

People may not understand that an image IS a product. It can be used as illustration, advertising, to generate ad income, support causes, make greeting cards and other products like pillow covers, key chains, mousepads, reprints, knock off versions of the art from Chinese sweat shops, and more.  All without the artist or photographer being asked or paid.  It is no wonder that…

View original post 162 more words

Advertisements

About Luna Arjuna

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one...
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to “Sharing” is a misused term that needs to die

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s